AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX & 2950X Review > Encoding Performance - gwinntheys1983
Encryption Performance
We see a similar story when encoding with HandBrake, the 2990WX is significantly under utilized in this test, maxing out at about 30% utilization. That said under those conditions you'd expect the 2990WX to roughly pit the 2950X and it fails to do so. Here the 2950X was 15% faster and I should also government note it offered nary real performance gain over the 1950X in this test. Meanwhile the 2990WX was only able to match the 1920X which is apparently a massive disappointment.
When encryption with Adobe brick Premiere we find a exchangeable spot, the 2990WX took 35% longer to fill out the workload when compared to the 2950X. The good here though is that the 2950X was 7% faster than the 1950X and that made it just 7% slower than the Core i9-7960X. So a pretty great result for the 2950X and an disastrous result for the 2990WX.
Although the export test only used the 2950X to the melodic line of about 90% and the 2990WX to about 60%, the falsify stabiliser exam where I run a dozen instances at the same time is able to max out the 2990WX at 100%. Even thusly the performance was mighty underwhelming and here the 32-core mainframe was once more slower than final stage years 12-core model and lone managed to equate Intel 10-core Skylake-X part.
Again while the 2990WX was extremely disappointing the 2950X wasn't. It shaved 5% off the 1950X completion time to take out top spot thusly an amazing result for the new 16-core processor.
Source: https://www.techspot.com/review/1678-amd-ryzen-threadripper-2990wx-2950x/page3.html
Posted by: gwinntheys1983.blogspot.com
0 Response to "AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX & 2950X Review > Encoding Performance - gwinntheys1983"
Post a Comment